Would anyone find it terribly weird for remoteStorage to allow "If-None-Match" headers on PUTs, and returning 304 Not Modified in case the document already exists with that ETag? HTTP specs only mention it for GET and HEAD requests.

@HerraBRE Maybe not when it comes to random new RFCs extending wildly popular ones. :)

Sign in to participate in the conversation

A friendly place for tooting. Run by the Kosmos peeps.