So this entire article is nothing but reasonable number crunching and extrapolation from official statistics from around the world. You may disagree with some details, or with the conclusions, but it is really the opposite of what I would think can be justified to delete or censor.
Shame on you, Medium. But also, thanks for the public demonstration of why nobody should post there in the first place!
Here's a point-by-point rebuttal of the article, by an epidemiologist: https://twitter.com/CT_Bergstrom/status/1241522140559503360
(I'm not claiming it's good; just adding for completeness sake. Form your own opinions, plz.)
The social network of the future: No ads, no corporate surveillance, ethical design, and decentralization! Own your data with Mastodon!